Search for:

On May 11, 2023, the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (“CFIUS”) issued a Frequently Asked Question (“FAQ”), which calls into question the use of “springing rights,” a broadly used instrument to expedite financings while complying with mandatory filing requirements.  The FAQ addresses the timing for when a filing must be made for a transaction triggering a mandatory filing.  Since implementation of the mandatory filing requirements, transaction parties have used springing or deferred rights to allow financings to proceed while those rights triggering a CFIUS filing are deferred or held in abeyance until after CFIUS clearance.

Background on CFIUS Mandatory Filing Requirements

CFIUS regulations require mandatory filings when (1) a foreign person acquires certain governance (including a board observer) or information rights in a business that develops, tests or produces critical technology in the United States, or (2) when a foreign government acquires 25% or more of the voting interest in a US business that develops critical technology in the United States, operates critical infrastructure in the United States or collects/maintains sensitive personal data of US citizens (i.e., is a “TID US Business”).

CFIUS mandatory filings must be made at least 30 days prior to the “completion date,” which is defined as the “earliest date upon which any ownership interest, including a contingent equity interest, is conveyed, assigned, delivered, or otherwise transferred to a person, or a change in rights that could result in a covered control transaction or covered investment occurs.” 31 C.F.R. § 800.206.

CFIUS FAQ

The FAQ clarifies that mandatory filings must be made before a transaction’s “completion date,” and the completion date is the earliest date upon which any equity interest, including contingent equity interest, is transferred.  The FAQ provides an example in which a foreign person acquires 25% equity with a deferred right to “control,” and notes that the filing must be made before the acquisition of the equity.  A 25% voting interest would, by itself, typically be considered “control” (e.g., a CFIUS triggering right). 

The FAQ leaves some uncertainty regarding the use of springing rights outside of the transfer controlling equity interests.  The FAQ does not address the second half of the “completion date” definition (as appears in § 800.206), which refers to “a change in rights.”  That part of the definition provides that the completion date is when “a change in rights” resulting in a covered transaction “occurs.”  Thus, it remains unclear whether the completion date for acquisition of a passive interest (e.g., 5% voting interest), combined with a deferred CFIUS triggering right (e.g., a board observer), would be at the time of the acquisition of the equity (which by itself is not a covered transaction), or only when the change in rights “occurs” after CFIUS clearance.

Author

Rod Hunter, a partner based in the Washington, DC office of Baker McKenzie, practices trade and investment law. He previously served as Special Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs and senior director for international economics at the National Security Council (NSC), the White House office that coordinates trade policy and supervises CFIUS. In that role, he managed CFIUS cases, including negotiating resolution of the most sensitive cases. A recognized expert in the field, he has testified before Congress during the legislative process leading to recent amendments to CFIUS’ authorizing legislation. Previously, in addition to coordinating U.S. trade policy at the White House’s NSC, he served as senior counsel at the US Trade Representative’s office, where he litigated cases before the World Trade Organization. He has also taught trade law and policy at the University of Virginia’s Batten School of Leadership and Public Policy and has testified before the United States-China Economic and Security Review Commission. Earlier in his career, Rod practiced regulatory law in Brussels, Belgium for a decade, served as a judicial clerk to Judge Boyce F. Martin, US Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, served as an associate to Chief Justice Sir Anthony Mason, High Court of Australia and served as an assistant to Senator John W. Warner, US Senate.

Author

Sylwia Lis is a member of the Firm's International Trade Practice Group

Author

Lise Test is an of counsel in the Firm’s International Trade Group in Washington, DC and practices in the area of international trade regulation and compliance — with emphasis on US export control laws (Export Administration Regulations (EAR) and International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR)), trade sanctions, and anti-boycott laws. Ms. Test advises clients on issues relating to product classifications, licensing, regulatory interpretations, risk assessments, enforcement actions, internal investigations and compliance audits, as well as the design, implementation, and administration of compliance programs. Ms. Test works regularly with companies across a wide range of industries, including the pharmaceutical/medical device, telecommunications, manufacturing, and technology sectors. She joined the Firm as a summer associate in 2007 and became a full-time associate in 2008. Prior to joining Baker McKenzie, Ms. Test served as a lawyer at the Danish Ministry of Defence.

Author

Daniel Andreeff is an associate in the Firm’s International Trade practice group in Washington, DC. Prior to joining the Firm, he interned with the Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control.

Author

Orfeh is an associate in the Firm's international trade practice in Washington, DC, advising companies on export controls, sanctions, and supply chain compliance. She advises US and multinational companies on trade compliance programs, risk assessments, licensing, review of proposed transactions, and enforcement matters.

Author

Alexandra Kumar is an Associate in Baker McKenzie, Washington, DC office.