In the recent Ontario Superior Court decision a summary judgment was granted finding both fraud and grounds to pierce the corporate veil of a corporate defendant. This case demonstrates how liability for even the most serious causes of action can be established by way of summary judgment under certain conditions.
Author
Brendan O'Grady
BrowsingBrendan O'Grady is a member of Baker McKenzie's Litigation & Government Enforcement Practice Group in Toronto.Brendan maintains a commercial litigation practice that includes class proceedings and all manner of contractual disputes. He has experience with consumer protection and product liability, cybersecurity and breach of privacy, employment standards and insurance-related litigation.