Home Submenue Internal Investigations

Internal Investigations

German Federal Constitutional Court preliminarily prohibits prosecutors’ use of documents seized at investigating law...

On 26 July 2017 the German Constitutional Court ordered a restraint on the use of law firm seizures. The Court held that Munich Prosecutors could - for the time being - not assess the material they had seized in the course of a dawn raid at a law firm's office.

UK High Court rules that litigation privilege does not apply to documents produced in...

The UK High Court ruled in favour of the Serious Fraud Office finding that certain categories of documents produced during an internal investigation were not covered by litigation privilege.

UK High Court rules that litigation privilege does not apply to documents produced in...

The UK High Court ruled in favour of the Serious Fraud Office, finding that certain categories of documents produced by Eurasian Natural Resources Corporation Ltd during an internal investigation were not covered by litigation privilege.

Legal Privilege in Internal Investigations Concerning Anti-Money Laundering Obligations: a Swiss View

The Swiss Federal Supreme Court considered to what extent work products generated by external counsel in the course of anti-money laundering investigations are protected by legal privilege.

Hong Kong: Court Confirms a Heightened Need for Disclosure in Disqualification Proceedings Against Directors

The Court of First Instance of the Hong Kong High Court ordered the Securities and Futures Commission to produce relevant documents obtained in its investigations to respondents of disqualification proceedings.

Legal Advice Privilege: Risks for the Unwary in Singapore

If a company's lawyers interview the company's employees as part of an internal investigation, can legal advice privilege protect the contents of the interview and any notes taken by the lawyers from later disclosure to a regulator or in subsequent court proceedings?

The Right to Remain Silent: Canadian Employer Mishandles Workplace Investigation (and Pays for It!)

An Ontario court held that the employer did not have sufficient cause for dismissing an employee on the basis of his pending criminal charges and allegations by another employee of potentially related conduct, where the employer had failed to carry out a proper investigation into the matter.

1 Year After Yates Memo: The DOJ’s Yates-Lite Approach

Last month marked one year since Deputy Attorney General Sally Quillian Yates issued a much-discussed mandate directing federal prosecutors to focus on not just companies but also individual employees.

FCPA Pilot Program Sheds New Light on the Value of Self-Disclosure

The DOJ issued a Pilot Program1 that provides its latest answer to a critical question in FCPA practice: What benefits does a company receive for self-reporting potential FCPA violations?

Preventing FCPA Violations by your International Consultants, Representatives and Distributors

US companies and others subject to jurisdiction under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) can be held vicariously liable for an FCPA violation committed on their behalf or at their direction by third partie

Send this to a friend